Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Fair Value Measurements

v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
 6 Months Ended
Jun. 29, 2012
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States define fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
•
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1. We value assets and liabilities included in this level using dealer and broker quotations, certain pricing models, bid prices, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
•
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, certain assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. For our Company, the only assets and liabilities that are adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis are investments in equity and debt securities classified as trading or available-for-sale and derivative financial instruments. Additionally, the Company adjusts the fair value of long-term debt as a result of the Company's fair value hedging strategy.
Investments in Trading and Available-for-Sale Securities
The fair values of our investments in trading and available-for-sale securities using quoted market prices from daily exchange traded markets were based on the closing price as of the balance sheet date and were classified as Level 1. The fair values of our investments in trading and available-for-sale securities classified as Level 2 are priced using quoted market prices for similar instruments or nonbinding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data. Inputs into these valuation techniques include actual trade data, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, and other similar data. These inputs are obtained from quoted market prices, independent pricing vendors, or other sources, to determine the fair value of these assets and liabilities.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The fair values of our futures contracts were primarily determined using quoted contract prices on futures exchange markets. The fair values of these instruments were based on the closing contract price as of the balance sheet date and were classified as Level 1.
The fair values of our derivative instruments other than futures were determined using standard valuation models. The significant inputs used in these models are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions, and therefore have been classified as Level 2. Inputs used in these standard valuation models for derivative instruments other than futures include the applicable exchange rates, forward rates, interest rates and discount rates. The standard valuation model for options also uses implied volatility as an additional input. The discount rates are based on the historical U.S. Deposit or U.S. Treasury rates, and the implied volatility specific to options is based on quoted rates from financial institutions.
Included in the fair value of derivative instruments is an adjustment for nonperformance risk. The adjustment is based on the current one-year credit default swap ("CDS") rate applied to each contract, by counterparty. We use our counterparty's CDS rate when we are in an asset position and our own CDS rate when we are in a liability position. The adjustment for nonperformance risk did not have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of our derivative instruments. The following table summarizes those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 29, 2012 (in millions):
 
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

 
Netting
Adjustment1

Fair Value
Measurements

Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading securities
$
114

$
109

$
4

 
$
—

$
227

Available-for-sale securities2
1,453

3,178

129

3 

—

4,760

Derivatives4
30

634

—

 
(138
)
526

Total assets
$
1,597

$
3,921

$
133

 
$
(138
)
$
5,513

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives4
$
12

$
239

$
—

 
$
(145
)
$
106

Total liabilities
$
12

$
239

$
—

 
$
(145
)
$
106

1 Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties. Refer to Note 5.
2 
Refer to Note 3 for additional information related to the composition of our available-for-sale securities.
3 Primarily related to long-term debt securities that mature in 2018.
4 Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.
The following table summarizes those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 (in millions):
 
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

 
Netting
Adjustment1

Fair Value
Measurements

Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trading securities
$
166

$
41

$
4

 
$
—

$
211

Available-for-sale securities2
1,071

214

116

3 

—

1,401

Derivatives4
39

467

—

 
(117
)
389

Total assets
$
1,276

$
722

$
120

 
$
(117
)
$
2,001

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives4
$
5

$
201

$
—

 
$
(121
)
$
85

Total liabilities
$
5

$
201

$
—

 
$
(121
)
$
85

1 Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and also cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties. Refer to Note 5.
2 
Refer to Note 3 for additional information related to the composition of our available-for-sale securities.
3 Primarily related to long-term debt securities that mature in 2018.
4 Refer to Note 5 for additional information related to the composition of our derivative portfolio.
Gross realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 assets and liabilities were not significant for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012, and July 1, 2011.
The Company recognizes transfers between levels within the hierarchy as of the beginning of the reporting period. Gross transfers between levels within the hierarchy were not significant for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012, and July 1, 2011.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company records assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. The gains or losses on assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the three and six months ended June 29, 2012, and July 1, 2011, are summarized in the table below (in millions):
 
Gains (Losses)  
  
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
  
 
June 29,
2012

 
July 1,
2011

 
June 29,
2012

 
July 1,
2011

  
Valuation of shares in equity method investee
$
92

1 
$
—

 
$
92

1 
$
—

 
Exchange of investment in equity securities
—

 
418

2 
—

 
418

2 
Equity method investments
—

 
(38
)
3 
—

 
(38
)
3 
Inventories
—

 
(3
)
4 
—

 
(7
)
4 
Cold-drink equipment
—

 
1

4 
—

 
(1
)
4 
Total
$
92

 
$
378

 
$
92

 
$
372

 
1 The Company recognized a gain of $92 million as a result of Coca-Cola FEMSA, an equity method investee, issuing additional shares of its own stock at a per share amount greater than the carrying value of the Company's per share investment. Accordingly, the Company is required to treat this type of transaction as if the Company sold a proportionate share of its investment in Coca-Cola FEMSA. The gain was determined using Level 1 inputs. Refer to Note 10.
2 As a result of the merger of Arca and Contal, the Company recognized a gain on the exchange of the shares we previously owned in Contal for shares in the newly formed entity Arca Contal. The gain represents the difference between the carrying value of the Contal shares we relinquished and the fair value of the Arca Contal shares we received as a result of the transaction. The gain and initial carrying value of our investment were calculated based on Level 1 inputs. Refer to Note 10.
3 The Company recognized an impairment charge of $38 million related to an investment in an entity accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Subsequent to the recognition of this impairment charge, the Company's remaining financial exposure related to this entity is not significant. This charge was determined using Level 3 inputs. Refer to Note 10.
4 These assets primarily consisted of Company-owned inventory and cold-drink equipment that were damaged or lost as a result of the natural disasters in Japan on March 11, 2011. During the first quarter of 2011, we recorded impairment charges of $4 million and $2 million related to Company-owned inventory and cold-drink equipment, respectively. During the three months ended July 1, 2011, the Company recorded an additional impairment charge of $3 million related to the inventory and revised our estimated impairment charge related to the cold-drink equipment from $2 million to $1 million. These charges represent the Company's best estimate as of July 1, 2011, and were determined using Level 3 inputs based on the carrying value of the inventory and cold-drink equipment prior to the natural disasters. Refer to Note 10.
Other Fair Value Disclosures
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents; short-term investments; receivables; accounts payable and accrued expenses; and loans and notes payable approximate their fair values because of the relatively short-term maturities of these instruments.
The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated using Level 2 inputs based on quoted prices for those or similar instruments. As of June 29, 2012, the carrying amount and fair value of our long-term debt, including the current portion, were $16,518 million and $17,292 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, the carrying amount and fair value of our long-term debt, including the current portion, were $15,697 million and $16,360 million, respectively.